Two Food Recalls This Week: What Your Business Can Learn About Allergen Risk in the Supply Chain

Nicole Inwood • April 22, 2026

Two Australian food recalls this week highlight why allergen risk management needs to extend beyond the factory and into your supply chain.

Two food recalls were issued in Australia this week. Both were caused by undeclared allergens. Together, they offer an important lesson for every food business about where allergen risk really begins and why most allergen risk assessments don't go far enough.


Austral Herbs – Certified Organic Garlic Powder (250g, 500g, 1kg, 5kg, 10kg)

Recalled 21 April 2026 for an undeclared peanut allergen. Sold through independent retailers in NSW, QLD, VIC, TAS, and SA, and online nationally. Best Before 8/12/2028.

Ministry of Chocolate – NEW YORK INSPIRED 195g

Recalled 20 April 2026 for an undeclared gluten allergen. Sold through independent retailers in NSW, WA, and VIC including IGA. Best Before 24 FEB 2027.

Recalled 20 April 2026 for an undeclared gluten allergen. Sold through independent retailers in NSW, WA, and VIC including IGA. Best Before 24 FEB 2027.


Why Undeclared Allergens Keep Causing Recalls


Undeclared allergens remain one of the single most common causes of food recalls in Australia. They typically come from one of the following sources:

        Supplier changes that weren't communicated

        Reformulations that weren't reflected on labels

        Cross contact from shared production lines

        Label vs specification vs ingredient mismatches

        Agricultural contamination in raw ingredients

        Hidden allergens in compound ingredients


We've talked about processing and packaging causes in previous articles. This time, both recalls point upstream to suppliers, so that's where we'll focus.


The Supplier Risk Most Businesses Underestimate


Agricultural ingredients: risk starts in the paddock

The Austral Herbs recall is a strong example of a risk most food businesses don't factor into their allergen programs. Peanut contamination in a garlic powder can start in the paddock.


Consider the realities of broadacre and horticultural farming:

        Crops are rotated season to season, and peanut is a common rotation crop in many Australian growing regions.

        Harvesting equipment is often shared between farms and between crops, carrying residues from one crop to the next.

        Adjacent paddocks can create cross contact through wind drift, shared headers, or shared access roads.

        Post-harvest storage in silos, bins, and drying facilities is frequently shared between product types.

        Transport bins and trucks are often shared between growers and between crops.


Each of these creates a pathway for allergen cross contact long before the ingredient reaches a processor or a manufacturer. A supplier declaration stating "contains no allergens" is only meaningful if those upstream risks have been assessed.


Gluten: the allergen that hides in compound ingredients

Gluten deserves specific attention because it is frequently undeclared in Australian food recalls, and it hides in ingredients most businesses don't think to check. Beyond the obvious wheat flour, gluten commonly appears in:

        Soy sauce and Asian sauces (typically made with wheat)

        Malt extract, malt vinegar and malt flavouring (derived from barley)

        Modified starch, glucose syrup and dextrose (source-dependent)

        Thickeners, binders and fillers in compound ingredients

        Seasoning blends, stock powders and flavourings using wheat as a carrier

        Oats (routinely cross contaminated during growing, harvesting, transport and milling)

        Dusting flour on dried fruit, nuts, confectionery and bakery ingredients

        Rework and shared ingredient bins at supplier facilities


A "gluten free" supplier declaration still needs verification. Compound ingredients (sauces, seasonings, premixes, flavourings) are where gluten most often slips through undeclared, usually because the information gap sits two or three steps back in the chain.


Five Questions to Ask Your Business This Week


1. Does your allergen risk assessment extend back to the farm and across your compound ingredients?

For agricultural ingredients, ask about crop rotation, shared harvesting and handling equipment, and on-farm storage practices. For compound ingredients, ask for the full breakdown of every component and how each is handled. You need to consider the risk.


2. When did you last reconcile your label, specification, and actual ingredients?

A simple three-way check between the label, the specification, and the actual product catches most allergen issues before they become recalls. Schedule this review for every SKU this quarter and document it.


3. Is "certified organic" creating a false sense of allergen security?

Organic certification covers production methods, and cross contact between organic and non-organic, not specifically allergen cross contact. Upskill your team so they understand the difference, and add it to your next toolbox talk.


4. Could you trace an affected batch quickly?

Both businesses this week had to identify every batch, retailer, and distribution channel at speed. Run a mock traceability exercise on one finished product batch. Trace it backward to raw materials and forward to every customer. See if you can reconcile all the raw material and finished product.


5. Is your allergen management plan a document or a working system?

Walk the floor this week. Open up conversations with three operators across different departments (production, packaging, incoming goods, warehouse) about their knowledge of allergens. It will give you real insight into where your system is working and where it needs improvement. Don't let a recall expose the gap between the plan and the practice.


Where Recall Prevention Really Lives

Undeclared allergens continue to dominate Australian recalls because allergen controls are usually spread across purchasing, production, labelling, and QA, with no single person owning them end to end. For agricultural and compound ingredients, the risk extends further still, right back to the supply chain. Getting clarity on who owns allergen management, and how far upstream that ownership extends, is what separates businesses that avoid recall headlines from those that don't.


How Pinnacle Management Systems Can Help

Our team supports food businesses with allergen risk assessments, supplier evaluation frameworks, mock recalls and traceability exercises, and allergen management program development. If this week's recalls have you questioning your own systems, get in touch.


Read the full recall notices:

        Ministry of Chocolate: https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/food-recalls/recall-alert/ministry-chocolate-pty-ltd-new-york-inspired-195g

        Austral Herbs: https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/food-recalls/recall-alert/greenstorm-foods-ta-austral-herbs-certified-organic-garlic-powder-250g

Contact Us.

PO Box 9, Kangarilla, SA 5157, AU

Contact Us

By Nicole Inwood April 24, 2026
Three allergen recalls this weeks signal a pattern food manufacturers can't ignore. Here's what's causing them and how to prevent the next one.

.

By Nicole Inwood March 14, 2026
MARCH 2026: MOVING FORWARD
By Nicole Inwood January 7, 2026
Recall Alert
By Nicole Inwood January 2, 2026
Across ISO 9001, ISO 22000, ISO 14001, and ISO 45001
By Nicole Inwood December 31, 2025
At this time of year, I always pause to look back before I look forward. I start with the evidence. Metrics. Performance data. Photos. The glimmer moments as well as the hard ones. The achievements, the breakthroughs, the incredible clients we have partnered with, and the work we are genuinely proud of. Then I focus on improvement. What worked well. What did not. Where we stretched. Where we missed the mark. Because continuous improvement only works if we are honest with ourselves. From there, I shift into a deep dive on emerging trends and what the year ahead may hold. This is not about prediction or being “right”. It is a planning tool. It is about anticipation. About building organisational muscle so we are not reacting late, but thinking early. From a food safety perspective, several forces are converging right now. Technology is a major one. AI is already influencing food safety in complex ways. On one hand, it gives us access to vast amounts of information that can support hazard analysis and system design. On the other hand, that information is not always accurate, contextual, or reflective of what is actually happening on site. This has serious implications for auditing. Auditors are increasingly presented with beautifully generated documents that may have little connection to real practices. As a result, we will see a necessary shift away from document-heavy audits and toward greater emphasis on verification, testing, and observation. Systems that exist only on paper will be exposed very quickly. Climate change is another critical factor. We are seeing disruption across supply chains, increased disease pressure in agriculture, greater reliance on sprays, and in some cases the loss of entire crops in certain regions. These pressures affect food safety directly, whether through raw material variability, water quality concerns, or increased risk of fraud as commodity prices rise. Flooding in the eastern states is a current and very real example that demands vigilance around water sources and contamination risks. Demographics and politics also play a role. Labour availability, capability, and experience continue to shift. At the same time, geopolitical decisions such as tariffs and trade restrictions can influence sourcing, cost structures, and ultimately food safety outcomes within our own country. The value in thinking deeply about these trends is not fear. It is opportunity. Risk management, when done well, allows us to mitigate emerging risks and also identify opportunities to strengthen food safety systems, protect consumers, and protect businesses. But this only works if systems are real, embedded, and understood. This is a critical moment to ask some hard questions: Is our food safety system genuinely protecting our consumers and our business? Does our HACCP plan reflect reality, or is it simply compliant on paper? Are our stakeholders aligned and capable, across our supply chain and service providers? Are we investing in upskilling to meet the challenges that are already here? If these are the questions you are thinking about, you are not alone. We share practical insights like this regularly through our newsletter, and we work with organisations to validate and strengthen HACCP plans so they stand up in practice, not just in an audit. If you want to stay ahead of emerging food safety risks and opportunities, I invite you to subscribe to our newsletter and reach out to discuss how we can support your system.  Planning early is no longer optional. It is a leadership responsibility.
By Nicole Inwood December 18, 2025
Leadership in Systems
By Nicole Inwood September 13, 2025
Top Tips for Choosing a Food Safety Consultant
By Nicole Inwood August 26, 2025
Urgent recall: Baby puff snacks
By Nicole Inwood August 20, 2025
How ISO 22002-100 Fits with ISO 22000 1. Role of ISO 22000 ISO 22000:2018 is the overarching Food Safety Management System (FSMS) standard. It sets the framework: context, leadership, planning, risk-based thinking, operational control (including HACCP), performance evaluation, and continual improvement. Clause 8.2 ( Prerequisite programmes ) requires organisations to establish, implement, and maintain PRPs appropriate to their activities. However, ISO 22000 does not specify detailed PRP requirements, it leaves that to supporting standards. 2. The Gap ISO 22002-100 Fills ISO 22002-100:2025 is a new foundational PRP standard that provides the “core” requirements applicable across all food chain sectors. It introduces common baseline PRPs (e.g., layout, utilities, personnel hygiene, cleaning, pest control, contamination prevention). This avoids duplication and ensures consistency across different sector standards. 3. Link to Sector-Specific Standards After applying the common requirements in ISO 22002-100, organisations then apply the sector-specific PRP standards: ISO 22002-1:2025 → Food manufacturing ISO 22002-2:2025 → Catering ISO 22002-4:2025 → Packaging ISO 22002-6:2025 → Feed manufacturing ISO 22002-7:2025 → Retail/wholesale (etc.) Each sector-specific standard is designed to be used in combination with ISO 22002-100, not as a stand-alone. 4. Practical Integration with ISO 22000 Think of it as a three-layer structure: ISO 22000 → FSMS framework (HACCP + management system requirements) ISO 22002-100 → Core PRPs (baseline hygiene & infrastructure applicable everywhere) ISO 22002-X (sector-specific) → Tailored PRPs (unique to your food sector, e.g., food manufacturing in ISO 22002-1) Together, they ensure: ISO 22000 provides the management system backbone. ISO 22002-100 and the relevant sector-specific standard provide the operational hygiene and infrastructure controls needed to make HACCP effective. 5. Certification Relevance For FSSC 22000, certification requires ISO 22000 plus the appropriate ISO 22002 PRP standard. With the 2025 update, this will now mean: ISO 22000:2018 ISO 22002-100:2025 (core) ISO 22002-X:2025 (sector-specific, e.g., -1 for manufacturing) So, ISO 22002-100 is essentially the missing link, it standardises the PRP “foundation” so that sector standards don’t need to repeat it. In short: ISO 22000 tells you what to manage, ISO 22002-100 tells you the baseline PRPs every food business must have, and ISO 22002-1 (or another sector standard) tells you the extra PRPs specific to your sector.
By Nicole Inwood August 13, 2025
FSANZ Recall - Cadbury
More Posts